Progressive Dispensationalism In Depth
THE NATURE
AND PURPOSE OF PARABLES
The Gospels contain several Kingdom parables.
But, before we address the meanings of these parables, we need to first look at
parables in general.
34 All these things
Jesus spoke to the multitude in parables; and without a parable He did not speak
to them,
35 that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the
prophet, saying: “I will open My mouth in parables; I will utter things kept
secret from the foundation of the world.”
Matthew stated two important facts in the above verses. First, that
Jesus spoke to the crowds exclusively by parables. That is, he did not teach
them using plain literal speech. His teaching to them was through cryptic
stories that needed to be interpreted before they could be understood. Neither
did Jesus expound the meaning of His parables to the crowds. He left them to
wonder what they meant, knowing that those with “ears to hear” would indeed hear
and understand.
Second, this was in order to fulfill a specific Old Testament prophecy,
Psalm 78:2. Jesus was the prophesied One, the one to reveal what had been a
mystery up until this time, “kept secret from
the foundation of the world.” His parables were one of the ways Jesus
began to reveal the mystery kept secret from the beginning.
After telling the parable of the Sower to the crowds, Jesus ended with
His usual comment:(Mark 4:9). Mark recorded an interesting exchange between
Jesus and the disciples immediately after His telling this parable. “But when He was alone, those around Him with the
twelve asked Him about the parable. And He said to them, ‘To you it has been
given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God; but to those who are outside,
all things come in parables, so that ‘Seeing they may see and not perceive, and
hearing they may hear and not understand; lest they should turn, and their sins
be forgiven them’.” (Mark. 4:10-12).
Jesus did not expound the meaning of His parables to the crowds or the
religious leaders. Only when He was alone with His followers did He explain the
meaning of these cryptic stories in plain language. The disciples asked Him why
He did not teach the crowds plainly. Jesus’ reply may seem strange to modern
Christians. After all, didn’t He come to offer salvation to the whole world?
Yet, Jesus said the reason He did not teach the crowds plainly was because it
was not for them to understand the mystery, but only for the disciples. Jesus
used obscure language with the crowds and religious leaders “so that 'Seeing they may see and not perceive, and
hearing they may hear and not understand; lest they should turn, and their sins
be forgiven them'.” (Jesus’ quoting Isa. 6:9-10). In effect, Jesus left
them in their self-imposed state of blindness for a reason. His parables were
meant to conceal as well as reveal, depending on the
audience.
As we read the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ interaction with the religious
leaders, it is increasingly obvious that Jesus provoked them on purpose. The
closer we get to the crucifixion, the more blatant and stinging were Jesus’
public rebukes of the scribes, chief priests, and Pharisees. Matthew 23
describes the climax of this antagonism, with Jesus’ open denouncement of the
religious leaders as “hypocrites” in front of the crowds of people gathered at
the
According to Luke, Jesus met two of the disciples walking on the road to
Emmaus shortly after His resurrection. For the very first time He clearly
explained the purpose of the crucifixion. They were still in mourning, not
recognizing Him, nor understanding the reports of the empty tomb. As Jesus
joined them, He asked why they were so glum. They recounted the story of the
crucifixion, saying that they had believed Jesus was the Messiah of Israel.
Jesus responded, “’O foolish ones, and slow of
heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! Ought not the Christ to
have suffered these things and to enter into His glory?’ And beginning at Moses
and all the Prophets, He expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things
concerning Himself.” (Luke 24:25-27). Wouldn’t you have liked to be privy
to that sermon? Can you imagine walking with Jesus as He unveiled every Old
Testament Scripture about Himself, and the reason for His suffering? The two
disciples certainly were deeply moved by this speech. After reflecting on this
incident, they said to one another, “’Did not
our heart burn within us while He talked with us on the road, and while He
opened the Scriptures to us?’” (Luke 24:32). That same afternoon, Jesus
appeared to the rest of the disciples gathered in
Now it all began to make sense to the disciples. Those strange words and
actions of Jesus the night of His betrayal, when He told them all to drink the
wine as a symbol of His blood of the New Covenant, and eat of the bread as a
symbol of His body broken for them, suddenly became clear. On this resurrection
Sunday, Jesus took them through the entire Old Testament, explaining each and
every prophetic Scripture that referred to Himself and the atoning work of the
Messiah before entering into His glory. You can bet that the disciples spent
considerable time soaking in the meanings of Isaiah 53, Psalm 22, and many other
passages that are much more obscure. Yet, there they were, suddenly clearly
understood by the disciples. The Messiah had to provide the atonement for sin.
The New Covenant had to be inaugurated with the blood of the Messiah Himself,
before He could enter into His glory, and rule in His coming Kingdom. All those
animal sacrifices they had offered year after year were merely prophetic of
Christ and His atoning work.
The mystery had been revealed by Christ through the prophetic
Scriptures. It was there all along. But, it was not understood either by the
religious leaders, the crowds, or even Jesus’ own disciples. It had to be kept
secret for one very important reason. Had all this gotten out before the
crucifixion, God’s eternal plan could have been derailed. Paul tells us why.
“But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery,
the hidden wisdom which God ordained before the ages for our glory, which none
of the rulers of this age knew; for had they known, they would not have
crucified the Lord of glory.” (1 Cor. 2:7-8). The crucifixion was
necessary. Therefore, secrecy from both the Jews and demonic powers was
necessary until after Jesus was crucified. This is why Jesus spoke to the crowds
and religious leaders in parables, and why when teaching His disciples he spoke
plainly of His second coming, but not the reason for His first
coming.
TWO KINDS OF
KINGDOM PARABLES
Many Christians are not aware that there are two
types of Kingdom parables. The first type refers to the Kingdom as something
that starts very small, and eventually grows into something
huge.
Matt 13:31-33
31 Another parable
He put forth to them, saying: "The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed,
which a man took and sowed in his field,
32 "which indeed is
the least of all the seeds; but when it is grown it is greater than the herbs
and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and nest in its
branches."
33 Another parable He spoke to them: "The kingdom of
heaven is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal till
it was all leavened."
In both of these parables, the Kingdom begins very small. A mustard seed
is extremely small. Yet, a very large tree grows slowly from a single seed.
Likewise, leaven is but a small pinch of powder, added to the dough. Yet, it
eventually leavens the whole loaf during the baking process. Both of these
parables indicate that the Kingdom would begin in a very small way, and grow
over time into something very large.
Of course, this idea seems to conflict with premillennialism, which sees
the Kingdom as coming exclusively at the second coming of Christ in a blaze of
glory, and is immediately a universal Kingdom. How do we as premillennialists
account for this? On the other hand, amillennialists cannot properly account for
the other parables that place the Kingdom on earth after the judgment and second
coming.
The parable of the mustard seed and the parable of the leaven both
referred to Jesus’ founding His Church. He started with only a small band of
disciples. Yet, His Church has grown into a world-wide body with millions of
believers. Eventually it will contain a remnant from every tribe, nation, and
language on earth (Rev. 5:9). Yet, Jesus called this the “Kingdom,” in the above
parables, during this gradual expansion in the present
age.
Are we to assume then that the Kingdom has already come, and there is no
future rule of Christ on earth, as amillennialists teach? Absolutely not! Jesus
gave more Kingdom parables that fully support the premillennial understanding of
the Kingdom. What many premillennialists have failed to see is that the Kingdom
comes in two stages. First, it came as a seed. Jesus called out of
THE WHEAT AND
TARES
24 Another parable
He put forth to them, saying: "The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed
good seed in his field;
25 "but while men slept, his enemy came and sowed
tares among the wheat and went his way.
26 "But when the
grain had sprouted and produced a crop, then the tares also appeared.
27 "So the servants
of the owner came and said to him, 'Sir, did you not sow good seed in your
field? How then does it have tares?'
28 "He said to them, 'An enemy has done this.' The
servants said to him, 'Do you want us then to go and gather them up?'
29 "But he said,
'No, lest while you gather up the tares you also uproot the wheat with
them.
30
'Let both grow together until the harvest, and at the time of harvest I will say
to the reapers, "First gather together the tares and bind them in bundles to
burn them, but gather the wheat into my barn."'
This parable is critical, not only because of the clear end-time
details, but because it covers the entire age in which we live. It is impossible
to chop this parable up, and put its application outside of the “Church age,” as
pretribulationists are fond of doing with Jesus’ teaching. The reason is that
the wheat and tares are left to grow side by side from Jesus’ time through the
present age until the harvest — Christ’s coming. Since the parable obviously
includes this time in which we now live, the harvest necessarily concerns
Christians.
Later in the chapter, Jesus explained this parable to His disciples as
follows:
Matt 13:36-43
36 Then Jesus sent
the multitude away and went into the house. And His disciples came to Him,
saying, "Explain to us the parable of the tares of the field."
37 He answered and
said to them: "He who sows the good seed is the Son of
39 "The enemy who
sowed them is the devil, the harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are
the angels.
40 "Therefore as the tares are gathered and burned in
the fire, so it will be at the end of this age.
41 "The Son of Man
will send out His angels, and they will gather out of His kingdom all things
that offend, and those who practice lawlessness,
42 "and will cast
them into the furnace of fire. There will be wailing and gnashing of
teeth.
43
"Then the righteous will shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father.
He who has ears to hear, let him hear!
There are several important points we wish to make from this parable.
First, the one sowing the good seed is Christ Himself (v. 37). Jesus (not
Paul) was the one to first proclaim the Gospel, and announce the initial coming
of the Kingdom. The book of Hebrews, probably written by Paul, concurs. “How
shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation, which at the first began to
be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed to us by those who heard Him,” (Heb.
2:3). Therefore, the “wheat” in this parable are Christians, from the time of
Christ’s disciples until the second coming.
Second, notice the “wheat” living among the tares are the “sons of the
Kingdom.” The field is the “world” — that is this present world system in which
we live. Those of us who have received the Gospel and subjected ourselves to
Christ our King, are now “sons of the Kingdom.”
Third, the wheat and tares remain mixed together in the field until the
harvest. There is no pre-tribulation rapture to remove the wheat seven years
before the destruction of the tares. Both grow together until the harvest, and
are harvested at the same time 1. No one is taken to heaven
2.
Fourth, when the harvest comes at the “end of the age.” the angels “will gather out of His kingdom” all those
wholly given to wickedness and lawlessness. The words, “out of His Kingdom,” imply that the Kingdom
was present during the former stage when the wheat and tares grew together. Yet,
it is also present after the harvest. Jesus goes on to say, “the righteous will shine forth as the sun in the
kingdom of their Father.” Here we have a clear indication that the
Kingdom is present on earth both before and after Christ’s return, and the
harvest at the end of the age. The purpose of the harvest is to eliminate those
wholly given to wickedness, that is, the sons of Satan, planted by him. It is
also to elevate the wheat to positions of authority, shining forth “as the sun” in the Kingdom. That is, to
advance them to their positions as rulers of the earth in the Kingdom of Jesus
Christ.
CONCLUSION
It is
apparent that the Kingdom parables teach a two-staged coming of the Kingdom to
earth. The first stage began with Christ’s earthly ministry, calling out of
Notes:
1. Both are harvested at the “end of the age” (v. 39). However, in the parable, Jesus said the reapers were ordered to first gather the tares, bind them in bundles for the purpose of being burned (v. 30), and then gather the wheat in the barn. Nothing suggests that the tares were burned before the wheat is gathered into the barn, only bound in bundles. Jesus was using imagery familiar to the disciples who lived in an agricultural society. They were no doubt familiar with the common practice of separating wheat and tares at the time of harvest. The typical procedure was to gather the tares first, bind them in bundles, and leave them in the field. After harvesting the wheat, the fields were burned to get rid of the debris, including the tares left in piles of bundles. This scenario fits a posttribulation rapture perfectly. Joel 3:2, Zech. 14:2, & Rev. 16:12-16 indicate that the wicked opponents of Christ will be gathered and brought down to Jerusalem for the battle of the Day of the Lord. This corresponds to the gathering of the tares first — Satan’s devoted followers bent on defeating Christ at His coming (see Rev. 19:19-21). The gathering of the wheat would then follow the gathering and binding of the tares. Finally, the wicked would be destroyed.
2. The concept of the righteous being taken to heaven when Christ returns is not taught in any of Jesus’ parables or plain teaching to His disciples. It is a concept totally foreign to the Gospels. All of Jesus’ Kingdom parables point to either the present state of the Kingdom on earth, or to the inauguration of Christ’s political Kingdom at His coming. The inheritance of the righteous is always related to the Kingdom (eg. Matt. 8:11). Some have mistakenly supposed that Matthew’s use of the term “Kingdom of Heaven” refers to heaven itself. But, the parallel passages in the other Gospels use the phrase, “Kingdom of God.” Both terms are synonymous, meaning the Kingdom of God. Both terms are derived from Daniel’s prophecy of the Kingdom in Dan. 2:44. “And in the days of these kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed…” In reality, it is the Kingdom of the God of heaven, “Kingdom of God” or “Kingdom of heaven” for short. Many passages in Matthew make it clear that the “Kingdom of heaven” is what was promised to Israel(cf. Matt. 3:2, 4:17, etc). Also, the Sermon on the Mount equates inheritance of the “Kingdom of Heaven” with inheriting the earth. (cf. Matt. 5:3,5 & Psalm 37:9,11, 22). The idea is that the Kingdom of the God of heaven comes to earth from heaven.
3. That the angels gather the righteous at Jesus’ coming is further established by Jesus in Matt. 24:31. “And He will send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they will gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.” This is perfectly compatible with Paul’s description of the rapture in 1 Thess. 4. Paul wrote that the living would be “caught up.” The Greek word means “to seize, to carry off by force” (Thayer).