The First Resurrection
Revelation 20:1-6
Tim Warner - 01/1998


Click Last Trumpet Graphic to Return to Homepage

In Revelation 20, John described the resurrected saints being given places of authority in Christ's Kingdom.

Revelation 20
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
(KJV)

The "first resurrection" which includes the tribulation martyrs is the only resurrection in the book of Revelation. Notice that John did not actually see the resurrection of the saints taking place, but described resurrected saints being given their places of authority in the Kingdom. It is clear that they had been previously resurrected. According to verse four, this resurrection includes those who were slain by the Antichrist. Therefore, they must have come through the tribulation, not bypassed it. This resurrection, which is clearly post-tribulational, was called by John, the "first resurrection." He contrasted it with the resurrection of the ungodly after the millennium. Of those who will experience the "first resurrection" he said: "Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years." The implication is that all those who will reign with Christ will be raised in the "first resurrection." The fact that he called this the "first resurrection" precludes the possibility of there being a resurrection before this one at the beginning of the tribulation. By placing the "first resurrection" after the tribulation, John has also placed the rapture after the tribulation.

Many try to escape this obvious conclusion by claiming there are two stages to the "first resurrection" of the saints. The first stage being before the tribulation, and the second being after the tribulation, as described in Revelation twenty. But this interpretation is extremely strained and unnatural. If John meant this was the second stage of the "first resurrection" he would have said so, especially since there is no other resurrection mentioned in Revelation. For that matter, there is no resurrection before the tribulation anywhere in the Bible! The original readers of this epistle would have had no basis to draw such a conclusion. The natural, unforced, interpretation of Revelation twenty requires a post-tribulation resurrection of the Church of Jesus Christ.

This agrees with Paul's comments in 1 Cor. 15.

1 Cor 15:22-23
22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive.
23 But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ's at His coming.
(NKJ)

Paul seems to say there is only a single future coming of Christ when ALL saints will be raised! No doubt Paul was referring to Jesus' plain teaching that all who belong to Him will be raised the same day.

John 6:39,40,44,54
39 "This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day.
40 "And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day." ...
44 "No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day. ...
54 "Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.
(NKJ)

John 11:24
24 Martha said to Him, "I know that he will rise again in the resurrection at the last day."
(NKJ)

Some pre-tribbers claim that this resurrection cannot occur at the rapture because it follows the second coming in chapter 19. However, this objection is based on misunderstanding the verb tenses that John used, and poor English translations.

John was NOT describing the "first resurrection" as taking place at that time. The English wording in most translations does not do a very good job of conveying the precise verb tenses found in the Greek text. In most cases in Revelation, John recorded what he saw in the order he saw it. But, in the case of the "first resurrection," the wording and tenses of the verbs in the Greek text suggests that the first resurrection was already past, and John was seeing the saints already ruling on thrones. The rest is his explanation of who these people are.

Notice that John did NOT say he saw the resurrection. He began by saying that he saw THRONES with people sitting on them. This was a Millennial scene he was describing. They are already reigning with Christ, INCLUDING the resurrected martyrs of the tribulation. John then went on to explain who these people are. The second occurrence of the words "and I saw" in verse 4 are NOT in the Greek text, but were added by the translators. They give the false impression that the martyrs were resurrected after the others. That is NOT what the Greek text says at all. Here is Young's Literal Translation.

"And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given to them, and the souls of those who have been beheaded because of the testimony of Jesus, and because of the word of God, and who did not bow before the beast, nor his image, and did not receive the mark upon their forehead and upon their hand, and they did live and reign with Christ the thousand years;"

Here is how the Greek text literally reads word for word: "And (I) saw thrones and (they) sat upon them, and judgment had been given to them and the souls that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus..."

The words "was given" (KJV) in verse 4 is the Greek word "edothee" (a form of "didomi" #1325). This verb tense points to an action that occurred in the past but has continuing results into the present. It is precisely the same verb used by Jesus in Matt. 28:18, where He said, "all authority in heaven and earth has been given unto me." SO, John was not describing judgment being given to them. Rather, he was telling his readers that judgment had already been given to them prior to his seeing them on thrones.

Also, the verb "lived" in verse 4 does NOT mean raise up, or the act of being resurrected. It is "ezesan" a form of "zao" (life). In this tense, the verb means the state of living after having been raised. Here are three other verses that use precisely the same verb in the same tense.

Luke 15:32
32 It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found.
(KJV)

Rev 2:8
8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive;
(KJV)

Rev 13:14
14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
(KJV)

As you can see, in every case this verb means a state of living AFTER having been raised, not the act of being raised. We see then that judgment being given to them was something already accomplished, and their resurrection was already accomplished when John saw them reigning on thrones in Rev. 20. Now, lets translate this passage, leaving out the words that are not in the Greek text, and using the more precise verb tenses. I have put John's explanatory notes in parenthesis in order to mark off what John actually saw from his regressing to give explanations. The parenthetical portion is not a part of what he actually saw occurring in sequence.

"And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, (and judgment had been given unto them AND the souls that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands); and they were living and reigning with Christ a thousand years. (But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished); (This is the first resurrection)."

Note the switch from the present tense, where John was narrating what he saw, to his regressing in order to explain who these people are, (the bracketed portion). The reason he mentioned "souls" was NOT because he saw "souls," but to identify some of the ones reigning on thrones as the "souls" he had previously seen under the altar at the 5th seal.

Rev 6:9-11
9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:
10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
11 And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.
(KJV)

John was showing the final results of the martyr's "waiting" for a little season. He described one large group who were all sitting on thrones. Then he explained that some of these were the "souls" he had previously seen under the altar, who had later been given authority, and were at that time LIVING and REIGNING with Christ in His Kingdom. This is also the position of the Jamieson - Faussett - Brown Commentary which says of this verse, "From #Re 6:9, I infer that "souls" is here used in the strict sense of spirits disembodied when first seen by John." So, in the sequence of events that John was describing, the "first resurrection" had already taken place (presumably at at the second coming). He was describing the aftermath of the resurrection, and what became of the souls he had previously seen under the altar, not the resurrection itself.

Go to: Technical Terms Associated with the Rapture


Click Bar to Return to HomePage

1