
|
"Take these things together and we see - not to avert to the three days and a half - a connection with Babylon and the papacy during these periods, which brings them, in addition to the difficulty of making days symbols of days, to be a continuous period when the woman rides the beast (not, is devoured by the horns), and therefore is a continuous period of some such length as is generally supposed. In a word, we may, I think, state it thus; The mystery of Babylon and the papacy have no place in the prophets, or the 1260 days mean years. A difficulty in date does not affect the moral evidence of the subject-matter of the prophecy; for difficulties may lie at the door of ignorance as well as inconsistency.
"It would be inconvenient here to enter into further detail. The true question to be discussed is, whether the papacy, as such, has any place in the prophetic writings or not, or merely infidelity. If it has, it appears to me that no doubt remains on the question; but I refuse no light on its special application to the last infidel state, though I deprecate a morbid disposition to apply all things to our own times. I rejoice, however, in the discussion, not merely in that it will throw light on Scripture by consequent research and inquiry, but that I am persuaded that this will lead more (for such I believe to be the truth) to the deep conviction that we are within the verge of the end of all, so as to be daily looking for the Lord, i.e., to be caught up to meet Him in the air in order to His judging of the nations. Amen. Amen." [p. 40] |
Although Darby argues for the "year=day" theory, and that the 1260 days means 1260 years of the Roman Catholic papacy, he seems willing to allow that he could be wrong.
The last statement is sometimes used as evidence that Darby had already developed a "pre-trib" understanding, because he speaks of "daily looking for the Lord." However, it is clear that he was a "historicist" at this time, and viewed the 1260 day tribulation as 1260 years of the Roman papacy. And he thought that the end of this period was very near. That would make him a post-tribulationist! And his "daily looking" for the coming of Christ was because he thought the tribulation was nearly over! This is a far cry from the "imminence" taught by pre-tribbers! Darby was not even convinced of "futurism" at this point, never mind a pre-trib rapture!
